Real-world analysis of apalutamide-associated skin rash in Chinese patients with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore the clinical characteristics of apalutamide-associated skin rash and management of skin rash in real-world Chinese patients with prostate cancer. METHODS: We investigated 138 patients with prostate cancer who received apalutamide in the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University from January 2022 to March 2023. The primary end points were the incidence of skin rash and the time to skin rash. The second end points were the grade of skin rash, the time to remission, the rate of recurrence of skin rash, clinical risk factors and management of skin rash. RESULTS: One hundred patients were analyzed. Patients were a median of 73 years old (IQR 68-77.75). Thirty-two patients (32%) developed apalutamide­associated skin rash. The median time to incidence and remission of skin rash were 57.5 and 11.5 days, respectively. Of 32 skin rash, 27 patients had apalutamide therapy maintained after rash remission. There were seven patients having recurrence of skin rash. By multivariable logistic regression analysis, we revealed that hypertension history (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.09-9.53, p = 0.035), bad life-styles (OR 3.29, 95% CI 1.11-9.8, p = 0.032), ECOG ≥ 1 (OR 3.92, 95% CI 1.33-11.55, p = 0.013), and high tumor burden (OR 3.13, 95% CI 1.07-9.14, p = 0.037) were independently associated with higher incidence of skin rash. CONCLUSION: Nearly one-third of Chinese patients experienced skin rash after taking apalutamide in our study. The poor health patients might have a higher incidence of apalutamide-associated skin rash.

Síndrome de VEXAS: manifestaciones clínicas, diagnóstico y tratamiento / VEXAS syndrome: Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment

El síndrome de VEXAS (Vacuolas, enzima E1, ligado al X, Autoinflamatorio, Somático) es un síndrome autoinflamatorio de inicio en la edad adulta que se caracteriza por mutaciones somáticas en el gen UBA1 y se considera el prototipo de enfermedad hematoinflamatoria. Los pacientes con síndrome de VEXAS exhiben manifestaciones inflamatorias y hematológicas que pueden conducir a diagnósticos clínicos como policondritis recidivante, poliarteritis nodosa, síndrome de Sweet y síndrome mielodisplásico. El diagnóstico requiere la evaluación de la médula ósea en búsqueda de vacuolas citoplásmicas en precursores mieloides y eritroides. Sin embargo, la confirmación genética de las mutaciones en UBA1 es necesaria. El tratamiento es un desafío y a menudo incluye glucocorticoides e inmunosupresores, con respuestas variables. Las terapias hipometilantes y el trasplante alogénico de células progenitoras hematopoyéticas se consideran terapias prometedoras. El pronóstico es influido por factores genéticos y clínicos. El objetivo de esta revisión es proporcionar una visión general sobre la patogénesis, la presentación clínica, el tratamiento y el pronóstico del síndrome de VEXAS para la comunidad médica latinoamericana.(AU)

VEXAS (Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic) syndrome is an adult-onset autoinflammatory syndrome characterized by somatic mutations in the UBA1 gene and is considered the prototype of hematoinflammatory diseases. Patients with VEXAS syndrome exhibit inflammatory and hematological manifestations that can lead to clinical diagnoses such as relapsing polychondritis, polyarteritis nodosa, Sweet syndrome, and myelodysplastic syndrome. Diagnosis requires bone marrow evaluation to identify cytoplasmic vacuoles in myeloid and erythroid precursors. However, genetic confirmation of mutations in UBA1 is necessary. Treatment is challenging and often involves glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants with variable responses. Hypomethylating agents and allogenic haemopoietic stem cell transplant are considered promising therapies. Prognosis is influenced by genetic and clinical factors. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the pathogenesis, clinical presentation, treatment, and prognosis of VEXAS syndrome for the Latin American medical community.(AU)

A phase 2, multicenter, open-label study of anti-LAG-3 ieramilimab in combination with anti-PD-1 spartalizumab in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

Ieramilimab, a humanized anti-LAG-3 monoclonal antibody, was well tolerated in combination with the anti-PD-1 antibody spartalizumab in a phase 1 study. This phase 2 study aimed to further investigate the efficacy and safety of combination treatment in patients with selected advanced (locally advanced or metastatic) solid malignancies. Eligible patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), mesothelioma, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) were grouped depending on prior anti-PD-1/L1 therapy (anti-PD-1/L1 naive or anti-PD-1/L1 pretreated). Patients received ieramilimab (400 mg) followed by spartalizumab (300 mg) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), along with safety, pharmacokinetics, and biomarker assessments. Of 235 patients, 142 were naive to anti-PD-1/L1 and 93 were pretreated with anti-PD-1/L1 antibodies. Durable responses (>24 months) were seen across all indications for patients naive to anti-PD-1/L1 and in melanoma and RCC patients pretreated with anti-PD1/L1. The most frequent study drug-related AEs were pruritus (15.5%), fatigue (10.6%), and rash (10.6%) in patients naive to anti-PD-1/L1 and fatigue (18.3%), rash (14.0%), and nausea (10.8%) in anti-PD-1/L1 pretreated patients. Biomarker assessment indicated higher expression of T-cell-inflamed gene signature at baseline among responding patients. Response to treatment was durable (>24 months) in some patients across all enrolled indications, and safety findings were in accordance with previous and current studies exploring LAG-3/PD-1 blockade.

Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque, erythrodermic, or generalized pustular psoriasis: Efficacy and safety results from an open-label, phase 3 trial.

Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, is approved in Japan for adult patients with plaque (PP), generalized pustular (GPP), and erythrodermic (EP) psoriasis who have had an inadequate response to conventional systemic therapies. This approval is based on results from the global phase 3 POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2 trials in which deucravacitinib was associated with significantly improved efficacy outcomes compared with placebo in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, and results described here from POETYK PSO-4, an open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trial (NCT03924427), which evaluated the efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily in adult Japanese patients with PP, GPP, or EP. The coprimary endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving a ≥75% reduction from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) and a static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) (sPGA 0/1) with at least a two-point improvement from baseline at week 16. Nonresponder imputation was used for missing data. Efficacy responses, adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs) were recorded for up to 52 weeks. Seventy-four patients were treated (PP, n = 63; GPP, n = 3; EP, n = 8). At week 16, 76.2%, 66.7%, and 37.5% of patients with PP, GPP, and EP, respectively, had achieved PASI 75, and 82.5%, 0.0%, and 50.0% had achieved sPGA 0/1. Responses were overall maintained through week 52. AEs occurred in 74.6% of patients with PP, 100% of patients with GPP, and 87.5% of patients with EP. The most common AEs were nasopharyngitis and acne. Rates of SAEs and discontinuations were low. There were no deaths. Deucravacitinib was effective and well tolerated in Japanese patients with moderate to severe PP and in a limited number of patients with GPP or EP.

Clinical Experience of External Application of Clearing Heat and Removing Dampness in Relieving Grade 2 to 3 Rash Caused by Programed Cell Death Protein 1 (PD-1)/Programed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Inhibitors: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: In China, grade 2 to 3 immune-related rash will probably lead to the interruption of immunotherapy. Corticosteroid (CS) is the main treatment, but not always effective. The external application of clearing heat and removing dampness, which is represented by Qing-Re-Li-Shi Formula (QRLSF), has been used in our hospital to treat immune-related cutaneous adverse events (ircAEs) for the last 5 years. The purpose of this study was to discuss its efficacy and safety in the treatment of grade 2 to 3 rash. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients with grade 2 to 3 immune-related rash in our hospital from December 2019 to December 2022 was conducted. These patients received QRLSF treatment. Clinical characteristics, treatment outcome, and health-related quality of life (HrQoL) were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty patients with grade 2 to 3 rash (median onset time: 64.5 days) were included. The skin lesions of 24 cases (80%) returned to grade 1 with a median time of 8 days. The accompanying symptoms were also improved with median time of 3 to 4 days. The addition of antihistamine (AH) drug didn't increase the efficacy of QRLSF (AH + QRLSF: 75.00% vs QRLSF: 83.33%, P = .66). No significant difference was observed in the efficacy of QRLSF treatment regardless of whether patients had previously received CS therapy (untreated population: 88.24% vs treated population: 69.23%, P = .36). During 1-month follow-up, 2 cases (8.33%) underwent relapses. In terms of HrQoL, QRLSF treatment could significantly reduce the median scores of all domains of Skindex-16, including symptoms (39.58 vs 8.33, P < .0001), emotions (58.33 vs 15.48, P < .0001), functioning (46.67 vs 13.33, P < .0001) and composite (52.60 vs 14.06, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: External application of clearing heat and removing dampness was proven to be an effective and safe treatment for such patients. In the future, high-quality trials are required to determine its clinical application in the field of ircAEs.

Tocilizumab for treating mevalonate kinase deficiency and TNF receptor-associated periodic syndrome: a case series and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD) and TNF receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS) are categorized as systemic autoinflammatory diseases (SAIDs), which are rare diseases characterized by early onset, severe conditions, and challenging diagnosis and treatment. Although different SAIDs have varying standard treatments, some SAIDs are poorly controlled after routine treatment, seriously affecting the growth and development of children and their quality of life. This study aims to provide more treatment strategies for SAIDs. CASE PRESENTATION: We present two Chinese patients with MKD and TRAPS who were resistant to TNF- (tumor necrosis factor-) α blockade. After using etanercept, baricitinib, and glucocorticoid, patients with MKD and TRAPS still had periodic fever and rash. Due to the unavailability of IL-1 antagonists in the Chinese Mainland, we started administering intravenous tocilizumab (TCZ) at a dosage of 240 mg every three weeks. They had not experienced fever or rash after receiving one or two doses of TCZ. Before treatment with TCZ in the MKD patient, white blood cell (WBC) count, and TNF-α level were normal, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) increased significantly, and IL-6 increased slightly. After treatment with TCZ, ESR and CRP levels returned to normal; however, IL-6 increased occasionally. In the TRAPS patient, ESR, CRP, WBC, IL-6, and TNF-α levels were increased significantly. After TCZ treatment, ESR, CRP, WBC, IL-6, and TNF-α levels returned to normal. The two patients were treated with TCZ for more than six months and achieved clinical and serological remission. Furthermore, they had no adverse reactions after injection of TCZ. CONCLUSION: In the absence of IL-1 antagonists in mainland China, tocilizumab emerges as an alternative drug in SAIDs that are resistant to TNF-α blockade.

Safety and efficacy of ibrutinib in combination with rituximab and lenalidomide in previously untreated follicular and marginal zone lymphoma: An open label, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) are indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHL). Median survival for iNHL is approximately 20 years. Because standard treatments are not curative, patients often receive multiple lines of therapy with associated toxicity-rationally designed, combination therapies with curative potential are needed. The immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide was evaluated in combination with rituximab for the frontline treatment of FL in the phase 3 RELEVANCE study. Ibrutinib, an oral Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is active in NHL and was evaluated in combination with lenalidomide, rituximab, and ibrutinib (IRR) in a phase 1 study. METHODS: The authors conducted an open-label, phase 2 clinical trial of IRR for previously untreated FL and MZL. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 24 months. RESULTS: This study included 48 participants with previously untreated FL grade 1-3a (N = 38), or MZL (N = 10). Participants received 12, 28-day cycles of lenalidomide (15 mg, days 1-21 cycle 1; 20 mg, cycles 2-12), rituximab (375 mg/m2 weekly in cycle 1; day 1 cycles 2-12), and ibrutinib 560 mg daily. With a median follow-up of 65.3 months, the estimated PFS at 24 months was 78.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.0%-91.4%) and 60-month PFS was 59.7% (95% CI, 46.6%-76.4%). One death occurred unrelated to disease progression. Grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 64.6%, including 50% with grade 3-4 rash. CONCLUSIONS: IRR is highly active as frontline therapy for FL and MZL. Compared to historical results with lenalidomide and rituximab, PFS is similar with higher grade 3-4 toxicity, particularly rash. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02532257).

Lamotrigine efficacy, safety, and tolerability for women of childbearing age with bipolar I disorder: Meta-analysis from four randomized, placebo-controlled maintenance studies.

This meta-analysis investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of lamotrigine versus placebo in preventing relapse and recurrence of mood episodes in women of childbearing age with bipolar I disorder. Following up to 16 weeks' open-label lamotrigine treatment, responders were randomized to double-blind treatment, including lamotrigine 100-400 mg/day or placebo, in four trials of up to 76 weeks. Women aged 18-45 years who received ≥ 1 dose of study treatment and had ≥ 1 efficacy assessment in the double-blind phase were pooled for efficacy analysis. The primary outcome was median time to intervention for any mood episode (TIME). Of 717 eligible women in the open-label phase, 287 responded and were randomized to lamotrigine (n = 153) or placebo (n = 134). The randomized group had a mean (SD) of 2.0(2.02) manic and 2.5(2.02) depressive episodes in the 3 years before screening. Median TIME was 323 days with lamotrigine and 127 days with placebo (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.49, 0.96; p = 0.030). Lamotrigine delayed time to intervention for any depressive episode (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.39, 0.90; p = 0.014) with no treatment difference for manic episodes (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.52, 1.58; p = 0.732). 2/717 (< 1%) participants experienced serious rash-related adverse events (AEs) during the open-label phase, and 52/717 (7%) had non-serious rash-related events leading to study withdrawal. Incidence of AEs and AEs leading to withdrawal were similar between lamotrigine and placebo groups. Lamotrigine delayed relapse and recurrence of mood episodes, largely by preventing depressive episodes, and was well tolerated in women of childbearing age.

Combined BRAF, MEK, and heat-shock protein 90 inhibition in advanced BRAF V600-mutant melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibitors in BRAF V600-mutant melanoma is common. Multiple resistance mechanisms involve heat-shock protein 90 (HSP90) clients, and a phase 1 study of vemurafenib with the HSP90 inhibitor XL888 in patients with advanced melanoma showed activity equivalent to that of BRAF and MEK inhibitors. METHODS: Vemurafenib (960 mg orally twice daily) and cobimetinib (60 mg orally once daily for 21 of 28 days) with escalating dose cohorts of XL888 (30, 45, 60, or 90 mg orally twice weekly) was investigated in a phase 1 trial of advanced melanoma, with a modified Ji dose-escalation design. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled. After two dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) (rash and acute kidney injury) in the first cohort, lower doses of vemurafenib (720 mg) and cobimetinib (40 mg) were investigated with the same XL888 doses. Three DLTs (rash) were observed in 12 patients in the XL888 60-mg cohort, and this was determined as the maximum tolerated dose. Objective responses were observed in 19 patients (76%), and the median progression-free survival was 7.6 months, with a 5-year progression-free survival rate of 20%. The median overall survival was 41.7 months, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 37%. Single-cell RNA sequencing was performed on baseline and on-treatment biopsies; treatment was associated with increased immune cell influx (CD4-positive and CD8-positive T cells) and decreased melanoma cells. CONCLUSIONS: Combined vemurafenib and cobimetinib plus XL888 had significant toxicity, requiring frequent dose reductions, which may have contributed to the relatively low progression-free survival despite a high tumor response rate. Given overlapping toxicities, caution must be used when combining HSP90 inhibitors with BRAF and MEK inhibitors.

Characterization of T-Helper Immune Phenotype in Symmetrical Drug-Related Intertriginous and Flexural Exanthema (SDRIFE) Endorses a Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Reaction.

ABSTRACT: Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) is a cutaneous drug eruption with a characteristic distribution of erythema on the gluteal/inguinal region and intertriginous areas with unclear pathogenesis. In this study, we aimed to characterize the T-helper immune phenotype in SDRIFE in comparison with psoriasis and eczema to further the understanding of the pathophysiology and immune response of this rare disorder. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on 9 skin biopsies each from SDRIFE, psoriasis, and eczema using immunohistochemistry for CD3 and dual CD4/T-bet, CD4/GATA3, and CD4/RORC to quantify the percentage of Th1, Th2, and Th17 cells, respectively. A significant difference was detected in the average percentage of Th1 between all 3 groups with the highest percentage of Th1 cells seen in psoriasis, followed by SDRIFE and eczema. SDRIFE showed significantly lower Th2 expression as compared to both psoriasis and eczema. There was a trend towards a higher average percentage of Th17 in psoriasis and SDRIFE, and the ratio of Th17:Th2 was significantly higher in samples of SDRIFE compared with both eczema and psoriasis. The findings characterize SDRIFE as a Th1 and possibly Th17-driven process, which could inform future therapeutic options and substantiate the model of SDRIFE as a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction.

Leprosy with type 1 reaction in a patient from Ontario, Canada without recent travel misdiagnosed as vasculitic neuropathy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Leprosy is rare within non-endemic countries such as Canada, where cases are almost exclusively imported from endemic regions, often presenting after an incubation period of as many as 20 years. Due to its rarity and prolonged incubation period, diagnosis is often delayed, which may result in neurologic impairment prior to the initiation of treatment. In this report we describe a case that is novel in its incubation period, which is the longest reported to-date and may have contributed to diagnostic delay. The case also uniquely demonstrates the challenges of distinguishing leprosy reactions from new rheumatologic manifestations in a patient with established autoimmune disease. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe an 84-year-old male patient with rheumatoid arthritis on methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine, with no travel history outside Canada for 56 years, who presented in 2019 with new-onset paresthesias and rash. His paresthesias persisted despite a short course of prednisone, and his rash recurred after initial improvement. He underwent skin biopsy in May 2021, which eventually led to the diagnosis of leprosy. He was diagnosed with type 1 reaction and was started on rifampin, dapsone, clofazimine and prednisone, with which his rash resolved but his neurologic impairment remained. CONCLUSION: This case report serves to highlight the potential for leprosy to present after markedly prolonged incubation periods. This is especially relevant in non-endemic countries that is home to an aging demographic of individuals who migrated decades ago from endemic countries. The importance of this concept is emphasized by the persistent neurologic impairment suffered by our case due to untreated type 1 reaction. We also demonstrate the necessity of skin biopsy in distinguishing this diagnosis from other autoimmune mimics in a patient with known autoimmune disease.

Anakinra and hepatotoxicity in pediatric rheumatology: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Anakinra is a recombinant interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor antagonist used in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), refractory Kawasaki disease (KD) and cryopyrin-associated autoinflammatory syndrome (CAPS). Anakinra associated hepatotoxicity, while rare, has been described in several cases in daily practice. ​In this case series the authors describe three pediatric patients with this side effect in the setting of severe macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) in KD and sJIA. CASE PRESENTATION: The first patient was a 12-year-old boy who presented with fever, maculo-papular exanthema and polyarthralgia. Tonsillitis, distal limb induration and tender cervical lymph nodes were observed. Erythrocyte-sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin (11,975 ng/mL), D-dimers (5,98 mg/L FEU) and soluble CD25 (3645 pg/mL) levels were elevated. Exclusion of sepsis / toxic shock syndrome warranted introduction of IV methylprednisolone and immunoglobulin (IG IV), with partial response. A MAS secondary to KD was assumed, and anakinra 2 mg/kg/day was introduced. Twenty days later he developed new-onset nausea and severe cyto-cholestasis, normalizing after 2 months of drug discontinuation. Posterior onset of polyarthritis and evanescent lead to a final diagnosis of sJIA. The second patient was a 2-year-old boy with a 10-day history of fevers, generalized rash, hepatosplenomegaly and strawberry tongue. Leucocytosis with neutrophilia and elevated CRP were observed. Initial treatment with IVIG in the setting of incomplete KD was ineffective. Mild anaemia, leukopenia and very high serum ferritin (maximum 26,128 ng/mL) ensued. Presumptive sJIA associated MAS was treated with IV methylprednisolone and anakinra 2 mg/kg/day, with prompt response. Four weeks later transaminitis was detected, and temporary anakinra suspension led to normalisation of laboratorial values. The third case related to a 4-year-old boy presenting with fever, maculopapular rash and cervical lymphadenopathy. CRP and ESR were elevated, and KD was diagnosed. IVIG and methylprednisolone were initiated with clinical worsening, warranting for anakinra introduction at 2 mg/kg/day. After three weeks, liver enzymes progressively elevated, resolving on 2 weeks of anakinra discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case series describing anakinra associated hepatotoxicity in pediatric patients with rheumatic diseases other than sJIA, bringing additional insight to therapeutic monitoring in patients undergoing this treatment.

Gray zone in the spectrum of autoinflammatory diseases: familial Mediterranean fever accompanying periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and adenitis syndrome: single-center experience.

Despite the advanced knowledge concerning autoinflammatory diseases (AID), more data regarding the optimal treatment options and outcomes of the children who met the criteria of more than one AID are required. This study aimed to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of children from familial Mediterranean fever (FMF)-endemic countries who meet both the FMF and the periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome criteria. Moreover, we aimed to measure the response rates to colchicine and tonsillectomy and evaluate the factors affecting the colchicine response in these patients. The study was conducted at pediatric rheumatology tertiary centre. A total of 131 patients (58 females; 73 males) who met both the modified Marshall and pediatric FMF criteria were included. The median age at onset was 18 months (1-77 months), and the mean age at diagnosis was 47 ± 21.88 months. The median interval between episodes was 21 (7-90) days. The median disease duration was 46 (6-128) months. Consanguineous marriage was detected in 17 (13%) of the patients. The most common clinical finding was fever (100%), followed by exudative pharyngitis (88.5%), abdominal pain (86.3%), arthralgia (61.8%), stomatitis (51.1%), adenitis (42%), myalgia (28.7%), chest pain (16%), maculopapular rash (12.2%), arthritis (8.4%), and erysipelas-like rash (4.6%). MEFV gene variants were identified in 106 (80.9%) patients. The most common variants were M694V heterozygous (29%). We found that patients with tonsillopharyngitis, aphthous stomatitis, and PFAPA family history were more likely to be colchicine-resistant and tonsillectomy responsive, while those with exon 10 MEFV gene mutations were more prone to have a favorable response to colchicine.     Conclusion: PFAPA syndrome patients with exon 10 MEFV gene mutation, showing typical FMF symptoms, should be treated with colchicine, even after tonsillectomy. In multivariate analysis, PFAPA family history and lack of exon 10 MEFV gene mutations were independent risk factors for colchicine resistance. Thus, tonsillectomy may be recommended as a possible treatment option for these patients. It has yet to be clarified when colchicine treatment will be discontinued in patients whose attacks ceased after tonsillectomy that was performed due to colchicine unresponsiveness. What is Known: • A certain number of patients with periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome concomitantly fulfill the familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) criteria. • While colchicine is proposed as a first treatment choice in familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), corticosteroids are recommended as a first-line treatment in PFAPA syndrome patients. What is New: • In patients with concomitant PFAPA syndrome and FMF, PFAPA family history and lack of exon 10 MEFV gene mutation are predictive factors of colchicine resistance. • The presence of exon 10 MEFV gene mutations in patients with concomitant FMF and PFAPA syndrome has a favourable effect on response to colchicine treatment.

Therapeutic effectiveness of upadacitinib on individual types of rash in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic eczematous disease with various types of rash, erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, or lichenification. Janus kinase 1 inhibitor upadacitinib is effective for moderate-to-severe AD. We aimed to investigate the therapeutic effects of upadacitinib on each rash type in AD patients in real-world clinical practice. Seventy-two Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe AD were treated with oral upadacitinib 15 mg/day plus topical corticosteroids. The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores for erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, or lichenification on the whole body or on head and neck, upper limbs, lower limbs, or trunk were assessed at weeks 0, 4, and 12 of treatment. The proportions of patients who achieved resolution or at least 75% reduction of EASI from baseline (EASI 75) for individual rash types were calculated at weeks 4 and 12 on the whole body or each anatomical site. The resolution rates for excoriation, erythema, edema/papulation, or lichenification on the whole body were 38.3%, 23.7%, 21.7%, and 8.3% at week 4 and 18.3%, 18.6%, 11.6%, and 13.3% at week 12, respectively. The EASI scores for all rash types significantly decreased at weeks 4 and 12 compared to week 0. The achievement rates of EASI 75 for excoriation, erythema, edema/papulation, or lichenification on the whole body were 67.2%, 66.7%, 49.2%, and 37.7% at week 4 and 57.3%, 65%, 41%, and 41% at week 12, respectively. The achievement rate of EASI 75 for erythema on head and neck at week 4 (45.3%) was lower than that on upper limbs (71%) and on lower limbs (70.8%), and that on head and neck at week 12 (42.2%) was lower than that on lower limbs (69.2%). These results indicate that upadacitinib is effective for all AD rash types, especially for excoriation and erythema, while head-and-neck erythema might be less responsive to upadacitinib.

Comparison of Plasma Metabolites From Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by Erlotinib Treatment and Skin Rash.

Erlotinib is a necessary anticancer treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients yet it causes severe side effects such as skin rash. In this study, researchers compared the untargeted compound profiles before and after erlotinib administration to observe changes in blood metabolites in NSCLC patients. The levels of 1005 substances changed after taking erlotinib. The levels of 306 and 699 metabolites were found to have increased and decreased, respectively. We found 5539 substances with peak area differences based on the presence of skin rash. Carbohydrate, amino acid, and vitamin metabolic pathways were altered in response to the onset of erlotinib-induced skin rash. Finally, this study proposed using plasma metabolites to identify biomarker(s) induced by erlotinib, as well as target molecule(s), for the treatment of dermatological toxic effects.

Cutaneous immune-related adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: Moving beyond "maculopapular rash".

Uncoupling toxicity from therapeutic effect lies at the foundation of the current state of the field of cutaneous immune-related adverse events to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. This will be achieved through understanding the drivers of toxicity, tumor response, and resistance via large, well-powered population-level studies, institutional cohort data, and cellular-level data. Increasing diagnostic specificity through the application of consensus disease definitions has the power to improve clinical care and each approach to research. Cutaneous immune-related adverse events are associated with increased survival, and their treatment must invoke the maintenance of a delicate balance between immunosuppression, anti-tumor effect of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, and quality of life. The multidisciplinary care of cancer patients with adverse events is critical to optimizing clinical and translational research outcomes and, as such, dermatologists are vital to moving the study of cutaneous adverse events forward.

Meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety of glucocorticoid combined with hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus rash.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have found that glucocorticoid (GC) combined with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has a good clinical effect in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) rash, but there is no relevant systematic evaluation at present. The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate and analyze the effectiveness and safety of GC combined with HCQ in the treatment of SLE rash. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials of GC combined with HCQ in the treatment of SLE rash were collected through computer retrieval of Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform (Wanfang), and China Biology Medicine disc (CBM) since the establishment of the database. The main outcome indicators included clinical total effective rate, adverse reactions, SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) score, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and complement 3 (C3). A meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3 software. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies involving 809 patients (406 in the test group and 403 in the control group) were included in this article. The meta-analysis results showed that compared with the single use of GC, GC combined with HCQ could improve the clinical total effective rate in the treatment of SLE rash (odds ratio [OR] = 4.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.50-7.30, p < .00001), and reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions (OR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.15-0.44, p < .00001); effectively reduce SLEDAI score (mean difference [MD] = 1.88, 95% CI 1.66-2.10, p < .00001) and ESR level (MD = 7.92, 95% CI 5.66-10.19, p < .00001); increase C3 level after treatment (MD = 0.36, 95% CI 0.32-0.41, p < .00001); and reduce CRP level (MD = 3.22, 95% CI 2.87-3.58, p < .00001), with statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION: Compared with the use of GC alone, GC combined with HCQ can improve the clinical effectiveness of SLE rash treatment, with a low incidence of adverse reactions and good clinical safety. However, the number and quality of studies included in this article were not high, so the findings need to be further verified by high-quality, multicenter randomized controlled trials.

Alectinib-induced rash unresponsive to desensitization: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Since the inception of targeted therapies in treating lung cancer, providers have had to be aware of a new host of side effects when selecting management options for patients. Although targeted therapies are creating increased hope for patients with non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), understanding their side effects presents a challenge for providers. Alectinib, a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a targeted therapy used in patients with non-small cell lung cancer found to have anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations. Alectinib is the focus of this case report and literature review as we seek to understand side effects providers may encounter when prescribing these therapies. CASE PRESENTATION: We begin our report with the case of a 63-year-old Hispanic female with stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer found to have the ALK genomic alteration. She was started on Alectinib, and on Day 11, she developed a severe maculopapular rash requiring hospitalization. After complete resolution, desensitization with Alectinib was attempted but unsuccessful. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the unsuccessful desensitization of this patient, it is important to report this rare side effect in order to better understand how providers can pursue management. Case reports such as this can aid providers in potentially preventing, treating, and rechallenging patients on targeted therapies in the future.